Hi Claudia, the layer doing the actual work in your stack might not be the voice profile. It might be whatever decides which sentence to keep when the model offers three. A profile gives you fingerprint-level consistency, like rhythm, openings, phrases used and avoided. But when readers can't tell with the 35%, I'd guess the imitation hasn't gotten better. Someone is still choosing, line by line, against a sense of what this particular piece needs to do.
That choosing is probably something we do naturally enough that it doesn't come up; which is why it's missing from most stacks, including the way I just described yours. Still worth holding open the question of whether we sometimes accept what the voice profile gives us a little too easily, because it already sounds right actually doing that choosing, or whether the voice profile is doing more of the work than we'd want to admit.
I would be wary of the third one beyond the marketing angle, but the other two sound amazing from my perspective. I'm just an engineer, and setting up a test and gather data are things that are significant in terms of the amount of time it takes. Having AI help do the heavy lifting of foraging for data is a great application, but the curation and internalization of it would still be on the person. Digests and summaries are great for heuristics and efficiencies, but when it comes to absorption, there's no substitute for doing that part of the work.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this! Marketing is a foreign concept that's been fascinating to learn about.
I’ll be honest, I don’t do the 3 step process you’ve mentioned. Mainly because I don’t know how to do it. Now that you’ve given us an idea, I’ll implement it in how I use AI. Thank you so much!
Hi Claudia, the layer doing the actual work in your stack might not be the voice profile. It might be whatever decides which sentence to keep when the model offers three. A profile gives you fingerprint-level consistency, like rhythm, openings, phrases used and avoided. But when readers can't tell with the 35%, I'd guess the imitation hasn't gotten better. Someone is still choosing, line by line, against a sense of what this particular piece needs to do.
That choosing is probably something we do naturally enough that it doesn't come up; which is why it's missing from most stacks, including the way I just described yours. Still worth holding open the question of whether we sometimes accept what the voice profile gives us a little too easily, because it already sounds right actually doing that choosing, or whether the voice profile is doing more of the work than we'd want to admit.
I would be wary of the third one beyond the marketing angle, but the other two sound amazing from my perspective. I'm just an engineer, and setting up a test and gather data are things that are significant in terms of the amount of time it takes. Having AI help do the heavy lifting of foraging for data is a great application, but the curation and internalization of it would still be on the person. Digests and summaries are great for heuristics and efficiencies, but when it comes to absorption, there's no substitute for doing that part of the work.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this! Marketing is a foreign concept that's been fascinating to learn about.
I’ll be honest, I don’t do the 3 step process you’ve mentioned. Mainly because I don’t know how to do it. Now that you’ve given us an idea, I’ll implement it in how I use AI. Thank you so much!